Public institutions are losing people’s trust. UNDP’s trends report for 2024 outlines ‘the trust deficit’ as a theme that currently shapes the development landscape. This diminishing trust in national institutions seems to be a global challenge, potentially leading to increased polarization, democratic backsliding and shrinking of civic spaces. Enhanced distrust drives societal and political polarization, which has been noted as the third greatest current risk that could present a crisis on a global scale in 2024. The latest Human Development Report speaks about group-based polarization as widespread phenomena, one that affects politics and shapes how global challenges can be addressed. Polarization often translates to intolerance, aversion to making compromises and zero-sum thinking, that sometimes leads to political gridlock. The added challenge of mis-disinformation further erodes our information ecosystems, complicating our ability to address global challenges and in turn hindering human development.
Distrust and toxic polarization powered by mis-disinformation are mutually constitutive and reinforce each other. It is important, therefore, to design and test new ideas, open policies that are accessible to all, aiming to make a dent in mitigating this global issue. One of the key policy message’s from OECD’s working paper on governance responses to disinformation is that ‘governments would benefit from a more holistic approach to disinformation’, guided by open government principles. Furthermore, one of the prescribed UNDP strategies for promoting information integrity is building trust, by providing trustworthy information that reach people at scale. Open government principles are also reflected in the indicators of Sustainable Development Goal 16, particularly in ensuring public access to information and protecting fundamental freedoms. Recently, we learned that there has been a significant increase in the number of countries adopting laws that guarantee public access to information, rising one third since 2015. Another significant initiative is the European Commission Transparency Register, a ‘database of organizations that try to influence the law-making and policy implementation process of the EU institutions’. This register allows for public scrutiny of the interests being pursued and creates conditions for people and organizations to track these activities.
These illustrative solutions are important and seen as a step in the right direction in enhancing public trust towards national institutions. Academic literature also takes interest in conducting experiments that provide novel insights into the links between accountability and (perceived) legitimacy. While various scholars suggest that enhanced accountability can restore citizens’ trust and confidence in public institutions, experiments and studies show more nuanced results. One can argue that policy experimentation in this space is important to give us more insights about the interplay between trust and transparency. Furthermore, the promise of experimentation is that it can provide us with unique insights about a proposed intervention, that can help us make a rational argument whether we should roll a policy out to scale.
That is exactly what we would like to put forward, а proposed experiment that governments/institutions/organizations can pilot and learn from it prior to deciding if it can/should be scaled. We also believe that it is worth exploring if this type of intervention could indeed enhance people’s trust in national institutions, by allowing more transparency and giving people and organizations more access to the daily program content of decision makers in our democratic societies.
The proposed policy experiment, explores the dilemma: can we enhance organizational transparency and in turn increase people’s trust in an institution by having the daily agendas/schedules of decision-makers in that institution open to the public?
This proposed experiment is designed to provide the public in-depth with in-depth information about the daily agenda of the decision-makers in public institutions, including the meetings they are attending, events they are participating in, and potentially the outcomes and goals of their daily tasks.
Conditional upon the interest of public institutions willing to partake in this endeavor, the principles that this experiment should abide by include:
This mini experiment will allow us to frame a research agenda adjacent to the proposed experiment that will help us learn about people’s behavior and perceptions. For instance, we can imagine complementary activities to this experiment that include:
We are interested in further researching and exploring the area of interplay between trust, open governance principles and publicly available information. If your institution or organization is interested in partnering with us to pilot this idea and develop a research agenda related to this policy experiment, please contact our team. We understand that every institution interested in conducting this experiment, will need to have a tailor-made approach on design-implementation of these activities, and a unique manner to connect to the public, and we are prepared to offer policy advice on how to do this. Together, we aim to offer new insights to the public and actionable intelligence to policymakers.
[1] References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of Security Council resolution 1244 (1999).
RELATED POSTS
Urban Talks is an interactive webinar series that spotlights cities and initiatives that are building new inclusive visions across Europe and Central Asia and wider, […]
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Europe and Central Asia released its 2023 Annual Report for the Slovak Transformation Fund (STF), funded by the […]
As an innovation team, we ‘re always looking for ways to use new technologies in our work. Whether that’s enabling digital payments, making urban planning […]
